Princess Beatrice could have been named something different if Queen Elizabeth II hadn’t stepped in a rejected the original moniker her parents chose for her.
Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew welcomed their eldest daughter August 8, 1988.
However, her name was not revealed to the public for a whole two weeks after her arrival.
In that time, the nation waited with bated breath to discover the name of the new Royal, who at the time would be fifth-in-line to the throne.
And when the name was revealed, it was a surprise to bookies and the rest of the nation.
No-one had expected the newest Royal in 1988 to be called Beatrice.
In fact, many people were pretty sure as early as May that year that Beatrice would be called Annabel.This was after a newspaper quoted Andrew saying as much.
Some people also thought the names Charlotte and Victoria were in the running.

Princess Beatrice (pictured, right) would have been called Annabel if Queen Elizabeth hadn’t vetoed the name (seen with Princess Eugenie and the late Queen Elizabeth II)
Not a single bet was placed on the name Beatrice at two of the largest bookmakers at the time.




